From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: fix cil push sequence after log recovery
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:26:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140707152641.GC4123@laptop.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140702144139.978978390@sgi.com>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:32:11AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> The CIL pushes are marked complete with transaction
> tickets and should be in the the correct sequence order.
> The back end of the cil push code uses the ctx->commit_lsn
> to make sure all previous pushes are complete before adding
> the commit ticket for the current cil push. Because
> xlog_cil_init_post_recovery sets the ctx->commit_lsn,
> the later pushes can incorrectly think that the first
> sequence push is complete and allow out of order cil
> completion records to be written to the log. If the
> system crashes, the log will be replayed in the
> wrong order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c
> @@ -78,8 +78,6 @@ xlog_cil_init_post_recovery(
> {
> log->l_cilp->xc_ctx->ticket = xlog_cil_ticket_alloc(log);
> log->l_cilp->xc_ctx->sequence = 1;
> - log->l_cilp->xc_ctx->commit_lsn = xlog_assign_lsn(log->l_curr_cycle,
> - log->l_curr_block);
So we set ctx->commit_lsn here, this ctx is open for business and
sometime later it's committed. If a subsequent ctx is pushed before this
one has committed, commit_lsn is already set and thus the wait checks in
xlog_cil_push(), etc. are bypassed.
The fix seems logical to me, though I'm curious if there was some
original reason for setting commit_lsn here (it looks like this and the
xlog_wait() bits both go back to the original delayed logging commit).
It also seems that the dependence on l_curr_cycle and l_curr_block is
the only reason for the existence of this post-recovery function. Can we
move the ticket alloc and kill it if the commit_lsn assignment goes
away?
Brian
> }
>
> /*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-07 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 14:32 [PATCH 0/5] Misc controversial patches Mark Tinguely
2014-07-02 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: remove efi from AIL in log recovery Mark Tinguely
2014-07-07 14:30 ` Brian Foster
2014-07-07 15:29 ` Mark Tinguely
2014-07-07 23:44 ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-02 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: free the EFI entries from AIL on forced shutdown Mark Tinguely
2014-07-02 14:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: free the list of recovery items on error Mark Tinguely
2014-07-02 14:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: free inodes on log recovery error Mark Tinguely
2014-07-07 14:30 ` Brian Foster
2014-07-07 15:18 ` Mark Tinguely
2014-07-09 9:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-02 14:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: fix cil push sequence after log recovery Mark Tinguely
2014-07-07 15:26 ` Brian Foster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140707152641.GC4123@laptop.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox