From: Iustin Pop <iusty@k1024.org>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Error setting extent size on a directory
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 09:09:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140714070913.GA29541@teal.hq.k1024.org> (raw)
Hi,
During the restore of a file system, a few directories failed to have
their extent size set:
xfsrestore: WARNING: attempt to set extended attributes (xflags 0x1080,
extsize = 0x800000, projid = 0x0) of a failed: Invalid argument
Since there were just a few, I've set the nodump flag (0x80 in flags
above) manually, which worked, but trying to set the extent size still
fails:
xfs_io .
xfs_io> extsize
[0] .
xfs_io> extsize 8m
xfs_io: XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR .: Invalid argument
The xfsctl man page says that an extent size should be settable any time
on a directory, so why would this fail? Looking at the kernel sources,
I see a number of possible cases where EINVAL is returned:
- ip->i_d.di_nextents non-zero
- requested extend size bigger than MAXEXTLEN; not the case here
- extsize_fsb > mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks / 2; not the case
- fa->fsx_extsize % size - extent size not a multiple of FS block size;
again not the case
So to me this reads as if the di_nextents check can also fail for a
directory which has extents, contradicting the man page. Which one needs
to be updated?
The question arises to if the extent size also applies, then, to
allocating extents for a directory - instead of just being inherited for
files (the man page says no).
thanks,
iustin
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2014-07-14 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-14 7:09 Iustin Pop [this message]
2014-07-17 9:04 ` Error setting extent size on a directory Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 19:13 ` Iustin Pop
2014-08-28 4:22 ` [PATCH] xfs: fix behaviour of XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR on directories Iustin Pop
2014-08-28 9:31 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-28 22:34 ` Iustin Pop
2014-08-29 0:46 ` Dave Chinner
2014-12-04 4:14 ` Iustin Pop
2014-12-05 0:11 ` Dave Chinner
2014-12-05 5:49 ` Iustin Pop
2014-08-28 4:24 ` [PATCH xfstests] xfs: add tests for XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR behaviour Iustin Pop
2014-08-28 10:16 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-28 22:28 ` Iustin Pop
2014-08-29 2:52 ` Dave Chinner
2014-12-04 4:20 ` [PATCH] xfs: add test " Iustin Pop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140714070913.GA29541@teal.hq.k1024.org \
--to=iusty@k1024.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox