* time for an xfsdump release?
@ 2014-07-14 16:06 Eric Sandeen
2014-07-15 10:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-16 3:40 ` Nathan Scott
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2014-07-14 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-oss
There aren't a lot of changes since v3.1.3, but with the rate of change of xfsdump (slow), I wonder if it's worth cutting a point release to get these bugfixes out there:
b1d6979 remove ancient sys_getdents code paths
9ed517b xfsdump: getdents.c: clean up ifdef-hell around sys_getdents
c3a4db1 xfsdump: Fix memory and fd leak in invutil/stobj.c
a88c490 restore: don't trash file capabilities
0ece1a1 xfsdump: handle large, wholly-sparse files
151858e xfsdump: fix DEBUGPARTIALS build
1162bdb xfsdump: avoid segfault in partial_reg() in error case
Thanks,
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: time for an xfsdump release?
2014-07-14 16:06 time for an xfsdump release? Eric Sandeen
@ 2014-07-15 10:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-16 3:40 ` Nathan Scott
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2014-07-15 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs-oss
Yes, sounds like time for a release soon. Dave also has some more fixes
and there's also an outstanding bug report as well.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: time for an xfsdump release?
2014-07-14 16:06 time for an xfsdump release? Eric Sandeen
2014-07-15 10:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2014-07-16 3:40 ` Nathan Scott
2014-07-16 3:56 ` Nathan Scott
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Scott @ 2014-07-16 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen, Dave Chinner; +Cc: xfs-oss
Hi,
----- Original Message -----
> There aren't a lot of changes since v3.1.3, but with the rate of change of
> xfsdump (slow), I wonder if it's worth cutting a point release to get these
> bugfixes out there:
I've verified and pushed a few Debian packaging updates folks have sent
through to the git tree below. Please include these odds & ends too...
thanks!
Changes committed to git://oss.sgi.com/nathans/xfsdump.git master
debian/Makefile | 2 +-
debian/changelog | 8 ++++++++
debian/control | 2 +-
debian/rules | 3 +++
debian/watch | 3 +++
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
commit 96be05e971e1e23c252f5432fe430cd724a52910
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:29:12 2014 +1000
xfsdump: update debian packaging for next release
Make a note of each of the Debian bugs resolved in this release,
so that they'll be automatically closed during next upload.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
commit f33aa73b89624feaeb94f4d48b88f2d480798420
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:25:36 2014 +1000
xfsdump: add a watch file into the debian packaging
Apparently it can improve some Debian tools that check it (e.g. UDD).
Resolves Debian bug #748482.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
commit fae9bcf317ce3a0d919ebdc6fd667993a4dbd484
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:21:27 2014 +1000
xfsdump: rebuild configure files during deb package builds
Use the same technique applied to xfsprogs recently to tackle
out-of-date config.{sub,guess} files in the build.
Resolves Debian bug #746531.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: time for an xfsdump release?
2014-07-16 3:40 ` Nathan Scott
@ 2014-07-16 3:56 ` Nathan Scott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Scott @ 2014-07-16 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen, Dave Chinner; +Cc: xfs-oss
----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
> > There aren't a lot of changes since v3.1.3, but with the rate of change of
> > xfsdump (slow), I wonder if it's worth cutting a point release to get these
> > bugfixes out there:
>
> I've verified and pushed a few Debian packaging updates folks have sent
> through to the git tree below. Please include these odds & ends too...
>
And some similar changes for xfsprogs... thanks.
Changes committed to git://oss.sgi.com/nathans/xfsprogs.git master
debian/Makefile | 2 +-
debian/changelog | 7 +++++++
debian/watch | 3 +++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
commit b6ad8545923aaa0bcc6ec7f7d3edea00382ef3a1
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:50:47 2014 +1000
xfsprogs: update debian packaging for next release
Make a note of each of the Debian bugs resolved in this release,
so that they'll be automatically closed during next upload.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
commit 1a05f9188b1a151fa6dcdec61880699d2acf53cd
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jul 16 13:49:16 2014 +1000
xfsprogs: add a watch file into the debian packaging
Apparently it can improve some Debian tools that check it (e.g. UDD).
Resolves Debian bug #748483.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-16 3:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-14 16:06 time for an xfsdump release? Eric Sandeen
2014-07-15 10:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-16 3:40 ` Nathan Scott
2014-07-16 3:56 ` Nathan Scott
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox