From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529C17F99 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 04:22:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1408F8087 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 02:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TSJTk2tRSnVRxVPS (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 02:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 02:22:26 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: v0.80.4 Firefly released Message-ID: <20140716092226.GA23561@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Sage Weil Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:45:59PM -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > This Firefly point release fixes an potential data corruption problem > when ceph-osd daemons run on top of XFS and service Firefly librbd > clients. A recently added allocation hint that RBD utilizes triggers > an XFS bug on some kernels (Linux 3.2, and likely others) that leads > to data corruption and deep-scrub errors (and inconsistent PGs). This > release avoids the situation by disabling the allocation hint until we > can validate which kernels are affected and/or are known to be safe to > use the hint on. I've not really seen an report for that on the XFS list, could it be that you're running into the issue fixed by "xfs: Use preallocation for inodes with extsz hints" (commit aff3a9edb7080f69f07fe76a8bd089b3dfa4cb5d)? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs