From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0647FD1 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 04:07:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDC2AC003 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PCj3DqsY9QTDGfCG (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:07:14 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/007: add project quota Q_XQUOTRM test Message-ID: <20140717090714.GA16015@infradead.org> References: <53C73562.3010005@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53C73562.3010005@oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jeff Liu Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:30:58AM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote: > From: Jie Liu > > Add test for project quota Q_XQUOTRM operations, this patch also > update the golden output file to match the new output. Changing the test to require crc filesystems seems like a bad idea. I'd suggest to simply do two passes instead: the first one unchanged, and the second one testing project instead of group quotas. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs