From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 V2] xfs: catch buffers written without verifiers attached
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:29:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140730162913.GA2830@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140730023023.GM26465@dastard>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:30:24PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> We recently had a bug where buffers were slipping through log
> recovery without any verifier attached to them. This was resulting
> in on-disk CRC mismatches for valid data. Add some warning code to
> catch this occurrence so that we catch such bugs during development
> rather than not being aware they exist.
>
> Note that we cannot do this verification unconditionally as non-CRC
> filesystems don't always attach verifiers to the buffers being
> written. e.g. during log recovery we cannot identify all the
> different types of buffers correctly on non-CRC filesystems, so we
> can't attach the correct verifiers in all cases and so we don't
> attach any. Hence we don't want on non-CRC filesystems to avoid
> spamming the logs with false indications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 7 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index a6dc83e..078b8be 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1330,6 +1330,21 @@ _xfs_buf_ioapply(
> SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_INCORE);
> return;
> }
> + } else if (bp->b_bn != -1LL) {
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> +
> + /*
> + * non-crc filesystems don't attach verifiers during
> + * log recovery, so don't warn for such filesystems.
> + */
> + if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
> + xfs_warn(mp,
> + "%s: no ops on block 0x%llx/0x%llx",
> + __func__, bp->b_bn,
> + bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn);
Are you intending to print both block number values here or the
b_bn/bm_len combo?
> + xfs_hex_dump(bp->b_addr, 64);
> + dump_stack();
> + }
> }
> } else if (bp->b_flags & XBF_READ_AHEAD) {
> rw = READA;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> index 149a4a5..9dc92b3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> @@ -1378,8 +1378,13 @@ xlog_alloc_log(
>
> xlog_get_iclog_buffer_size(mp, log);
>
> + /*
> + * Use a block number of -1 for the extra log buffer used during splits
> + * so that it will trigger errors if we ever try to do IO on it without
> + * first having set it up properly.
> + */
> error = -ENOMEM;
> - bp = xfs_buf_alloc(mp->m_logdev_targp, 0, BTOBB(log->l_iclog_size), 0);
> + bp = xfs_buf_alloc(mp->m_logdev_targp, -1LL, BTOBB(log->l_iclog_size), 0);
How about XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL (here and above)?
Brian
> if (!bp)
> goto out_free_log;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-30 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-30 1:48 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: missing verifer fixes Dave Chinner
2014-07-30 1:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: catch buffers written without verifiers attached Dave Chinner
2014-07-30 2:29 ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-30 2:30 ` [PATCH 1/4 V2] " Dave Chinner
2014-07-30 16:29 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2014-07-30 21:39 ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-30 1:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: ensure verifiers are attached to recovered buffers Dave Chinner
2014-07-30 16:30 ` Brian Foster
2014-07-30 1:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: quotacheck leaves dquot buffers without verifiers Dave Chinner
2014-07-30 16:30 ` Brian Foster
2014-07-30 1:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: dquot recovery needs verifiers Dave Chinner
2014-07-30 12:30 ` Fanael Linithien
2014-07-30 21:43 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140730162913.GA2830@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox