From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53B57F75 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:43:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FED2AC003 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id XnUCmAKXi2Xk0pea for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:43:34 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: dquot recovery needs verifiers Message-ID: <20140730214334.GN20518@dastard> References: <1406684929-11133-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1406684929-11133-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Fanael Linithien Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 02:30:11PM +0200, Fanael Linithien wrote: > 2014-07-30 3:48 GMT+02:00 Dave Chinner : > > + if (!mp->m_qflags == 0) > > + return false; > > Is it a typo, or is it intentionally obfuscated mp->m_qflags != 0? Ugh. Two patches in the series that weren't properly uptodate. I'll resend the series.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs