From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E737F82 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:58:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F0D304043 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id rViL4lwVa2L2KPTY for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 08:57:32 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Delaylog information enquiry Message-ID: <20140730225732.GQ20518@dastard> References: <20140729123815.GA13120@bfoster.bfoster> <20140729234151.GJ26465@dastard> <20140730081858.GN26465@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Grozdan Cc: Brian Foster , "Frank ." , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Grozdan wrote: > I don't want to start another thread as this is my last question but > it's one unrelated to the original question from Frank You should always start a new thread when you have an unrelated question. At minimum, you should change the subject line... > One of my partitions was almost full (there was 5 GB over according to > df -h). I had about 8 torrents open in the client, all sizes between 4 > and 6 GB (they were all downloaded and got never "released" from the > client as I was seeding back). When I tried to add a torrent to > download which was 3 GB, the client reported that there was no more > space left over on the partition. I suspect this is related to > speculative preallocation and because the 8 torrents were all "open" > they still had extra space allocated by the speculative preallocation > and thus I couldn't add the 3GB torrent even though df says there was > 5GB over but in reality it was much less. Am I correct on this or is > there something completely else that happened? No idea - not enough information. Please start a new thread, including the information here: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F as well as the 'xfs_bmap -vp' output for the torrents in question. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs