From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120837F98 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:16:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0198AC008 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JKaXFqYOxwgVrolG (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:16:55 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] xfs: discombobulate sb updates and kill xfs_vnode.h Message-ID: <20140731171655.GA30301@infradead.org> References: <1406791995-14723-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1406791995-14723-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:33:09PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hi folks, > > Really two patch series in one. The first two patches remove the > bitfield based superblock update method and replace it with a simple > "update and log everything" operation. Superblock updates are > now relatively rare so there's no need to optimise for single field > updates. This patchset removes all that complex code and makes > everything nice and simple. Is there any deeper rationale why you want to get rid of it? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs