From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D787F90 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 19:54:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AE7304053 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 17:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id G629DE1ezTHJLiSc for ; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 17:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 10:54:04 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels? Message-ID: <20140809005404.GG26465@dastard> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Fanael Linithien Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:23:46PM +0200, Fanael Linithien wrote: > Will the verifier fixes get backported to 3.15 and/or 3.16, or do we > have to wait for 3.17? What fixes are you talking about? List of commits, please, noting whether the commit already has a "cc: " in it or not. > I don't want to wait for 3.17. My / has just been eaten by this bug, > and I'm reluctant to reinstall until it's fixed. Patch your kernel with the fixes you've identified are necessary, then - it can take some time for fixes to propagate through the stable process.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs