From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1F97F4E for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 02:17:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9728F8035 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FwEDMqwnRir03Tl6 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:16:29 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels? Message-ID: <20140811071629.GK26465@dastard> References: <20140809005404.GG26465@dastard> <20140811043219.GJ26465@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140811043219.GJ26465@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Fanael Linithien Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:32:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 05:55:19PM +0200, Fanael Linithien wrote: > > 2014-08-09 2:54 GMT+02:00 Dave Chinner : > > > What fixes are you talking about? List of commits, please, noting > > > whether the commit already has a "cc: " in > > > it or not. > > > > These are the commits: > > > > 400b9d88757c0bfbdfa97014e090ec40a31c1282 > > 67dc288c21064b31a98a53dc64f6b9714b819fd6 (this is the only one with the cc) > > 5fd364fee81a7888af806e42ed8a91c845894f2d > > ad3714b82c631a34724da09a7daa53afcab952fa > > Ok, but please use the "one-line format" when quoting commits. > > I.e. this: > > $ git log --oneline -n 4 ad3714b > ad3714b xfs: dquot recovery needs verifiers > 5fd364f xfs: quotacheck leaves dquot buffers without verifiers > 67dc288 xfs: ensure verifiers are attached to recovered buffers > 400b9d8 xfs: catch buffers written without verifiers attached Actually, I'm not going to send this last patch back to older, stable kernels. I really don't want to have to port random patches back to older kernels to avoid it generating false positives. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs