public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: remove rbpp check from xfs_rtmodify_summary_int
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:20:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140822132004.GD3915@laptop.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F696D7.2030906@sandeen.net>

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:03:19PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> rbpp is always passed into xfs_rtmodify_summary
> and xfs_rtget_summary, so there is no need to
> test for it in xfs_rtmodify_summary_int.
> 

Looks fine, but this is also called through a variety of twisty paths.
Could we add a top-level error check or assert?

Brian

> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c
> index 50e3b93..7c818f1 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rtbitmap.c
> @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ xfs_rtmodify_summary_int(
>  	/*
>  	 * If we have an old buffer, and the block number matches, use that.
>  	 */
> -	if (rbpp && *rbpp && *rsb == sb)
> +	if (*rbpp && *rsb == sb)
>  		bp = *rbpp;
>  	/*
>  	 * Otherwise we have to get the buffer.
> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ xfs_rtmodify_summary_int(
>  		/*
>  		 * If there was an old one, get rid of it first.
>  		 */
> -		if (rbpp && *rbpp)
> +		if (*rbpp)
>  			xfs_trans_brelse(tp, *rbpp);
>  		error = xfs_rtbuf_get(mp, tp, sb, 1, &bp);
>  		if (error) {
> @@ -478,10 +478,8 @@ xfs_rtmodify_summary_int(
>  		/*
>  		 * Remember this buffer and block for the next call.
>  		 */
> -		if (rbpp) {
> -			*rbpp = bp;
> -			*rsb = sb;
> -		}
> +		*rbpp = bp;
> +		*rsb = sb;
>  	}
>  	/*
>  	 * Point to the summary information, modify/log it, and/or copy it out.
> @@ -493,14 +491,8 @@ xfs_rtmodify_summary_int(
>  		*sp += delta;
>  		xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, bp, first, first + sizeof(*sp) - 1);
>  	}
> -	if (sum) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Drop the buffer if we're not asked to remember it.
> -		 */
> -		if (!rbpp)
> -			xfs_trans_brelse(tp, bp);
> +	if (sum)
>  		*sum = *sp;
> -	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-22 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-22  0:51 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: more code refactoring Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22  0:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: check resblks before calling xfs_dir_canenter Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22 13:19   ` Brian Foster
2014-08-29  0:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-22  0:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: combine xfs_dir_canenter into xfs_dir_createname Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22 13:19   ` Brian Foster
2014-08-29  1:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-29  2:14   ` [PATCH 2/4 V2] " Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22  1:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: combine xfs_rtmodify_summary and xfs_rtget_summary Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22 13:19   ` Brian Foster
2014-08-22 15:01     ` Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22 15:23       ` Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22  1:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: remove rbpp check from xfs_rtmodify_summary_int Eric Sandeen
2014-08-22 13:20   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2014-08-23 23:50     ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140822132004.GD3915@laptop.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox