From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9B37F62 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:39:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859EF8F8052 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JE82EkG4VBSpUL3r (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:39:11 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF Message-ID: <20140829003911.GA30463@infradead.org> References: <1409226551-16570-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1409226551-16570-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1409226551-16570-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Not sure if my 10 cents are worth anything given that I haven't spent much time with this code recently, but I feel very uneasy diverging from the generic path in this area. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs