From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29])
	by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44EE7F72
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:59:26 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11])
	by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB0C304051
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9])
	by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id LSGWICRT8sq8Lv0b (version=TLSv1
	cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:59:23 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: check resblks before calling xfs_dir_canenter
Message-ID: <20140829005923.GA26340@infradead.org>
References: <53F6942B.80808@redhat.com>
 <53F694F9.9030406@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53F694F9.9030406@sandeen.net>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

Looks good (although not useful on it's own, but there's more followups)

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs