From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564B67F4E for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 04:47:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366668F8040 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 02:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id epdsR31eE5pxGU4g for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 02:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:46:59 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Is XFS suitable for 350 million files on 20TB storage? Message-ID: <20140908094659.GC30012@dastard> References: <540986B1.4080306@profihost.ag> <20140905123058.GA29710@bfoster.bfoster> <5409AF40.10801@profihost.ag> <20140905230528.GO20473@dastard> <540AB933.4030707@profihost.ag> <20140906150412.GB23506@bfoster.bfoster> <20140906225654.GB9955@dastard> <540D6A6C.9090801@profihost.ag> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <540D6A6C.9090801@profihost.ag> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG Cc: Brian Foster , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:35:56AM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Thanks, > > upgraded to 3.16.2 and xfsprogs 3.2.1. Let's see how it behaves with finobt. You need to mkfs the filesystem to use finobt - it's not something that an upgrade will just switch on. i.e. # mkfs.xfs -m crc=1,finobt=1 Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs