From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF0E7F3F for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 14:46:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D861AC001 for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ymBNWeD7bLmzsrpQ (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:45:59 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] xfs_io: add mremap command Message-ID: <20140913194559.GA28479@infradead.org> References: <54111610.4080604@redhat.com> <54132553.9090202@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54132553.9090202@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:54:43AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > This adds a simple mremap command to xfs_io. > > It does not take a start address; it uses the existing > start address, so the sized passed will be the new total > size of the mapping. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks good to me, but I'd feel much more comfortable about merging it if we had an xfstests test case that actually exercises it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs