Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services

Carlos Maiolino
2014-09-30T20:13:08Z

Thanks dave.

Can I use your kernel.org tree from now then?

Regarding the mailing list, let me know if you need some help

On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:00:46AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:18:57AM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm sorry for this kind of "fancy" question from my side, but I'm wondering why
> > xfs project infra-structure (mailing list, git trees), does not use the "usual
> > public" services. I mean, does anyone thought about moving xfs mailing list to
> > vger.kernel.org, and the git trees to git.kernel.org?
>
> I'm already using git.kernel.org for my master XFS trees. The ones
> on oss.sgi.com are simply now downstream mirrors. There's still a
> few things I need to organise (e.g. where release tarballs are put)
> before we make the kernel.org trees the official source of XFS
> source code.
>
> We already have a linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org mailing list - we just
> don't use it. Again, more organisation stuff to do to switch over
> (i.e. forwarding from xfs@oss.sgi.com to the vger list) and then
> updating documentation everywhere and getting people to start using
> it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

--
Carlos