* Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services
@ 2014-09-30 14:18 Carlos Maiolino
2014-09-30 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2014-09-30 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
Hi guys,
I'm sorry for this kind of "fancy" question from my side, but I'm wondering why
xfs project infra-structure (mailing list, git trees), does not use the "usual
public" services. I mean, does anyone thought about moving xfs mailing list to
vger.kernel.org, and the git trees to git.kernel.org?
Sorry about been asking it mainly because I'm too lazy to keep deleting spams
from my inbox, and also, because having 'everything I need' in a single place
(kernel.org) would make my life easier (and probably many other lives :).
Anyway, it's just a question/suggestion, please don't get me wrong here.
IIRC there were some discussion regarding this some time ago, but, I'm not
sure where the discussion stopped and/or if any decision were taken.
Cheers o>
--
Carlos
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services
2014-09-30 14:18 Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services Carlos Maiolino
@ 2014-09-30 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-09-30 15:02 ` Carlos Maiolino
2014-09-30 17:55 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-09-30 20:00 ` Dave Chinner
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2014-09-30 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
On 9/30/14 9:18 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm sorry for this kind of "fancy" question from my side, but I'm wondering why
> xfs project infra-structure (mailing list, git trees), does not use the "usual
> public" services. I mean, does anyone thought about moving xfs mailing list to
> vger.kernel.org, and the git trees to git.kernel.org?
Please see the prior thread on 8/6/14:
[DISCUSS] Moving from oss.sgi.com to kernel.org
:)
> Sorry about been asking it mainly because I'm too lazy to keep deleting spams
> from my inbox, and also, because having 'everything I need' in a single place
> (kernel.org) would make my life easier (and probably many other lives :).
>
> Anyway, it's just a question/suggestion, please don't get me wrong here.
> IIRC there were some discussion regarding this some time ago, but, I'm not
> sure where the discussion stopped and/or if any decision were taken.
I think it's still the plan, but takes some time & effort & coordination.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services
2014-09-30 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2014-09-30 15:02 ` Carlos Maiolino
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2014-09-30 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs
> Please see the prior thread on 8/6/14:
> [DISCUSS] Moving from oss.sgi.com to kernel.org
>
I will :)
> :)
>
> > Sorry about been asking it mainly because I'm too lazy to keep deleting spams
> > from my inbox, and also, because having 'everything I need' in a single place
> > (kernel.org) would make my life easier (and probably many other lives :).
> >
> > Anyway, it's just a question/suggestion, please don't get me wrong here.
> > IIRC there were some discussion regarding this some time ago, but, I'm not
> > sure where the discussion stopped and/or if any decision were taken.
>
> I think it's still the plan, but takes some time & effort & coordination.
>
Thanks for the answer. And, if people need help to move it, let me know, I'm
willing to spend time helping the move.
cheers
> -Eric
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
Carlos
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services
2014-09-30 14:18 Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services Carlos Maiolino
2014-09-30 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2014-09-30 17:55 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-09-30 20:00 ` Dave Chinner
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz @ 2014-09-30 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
On Tuesday 30 of September 2014, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm sorry for this kind of "fancy" question from my side, but I'm wondering
> why xfs project infra-structure (mailing list, git trees), does not use
> the "usual public" services. I mean, does anyone thought about moving xfs
> mailing list to vger.kernel.org, and the git trees to git.kernel.org?
vger.kernel.org has rude postmasters (at least one of them) that are unwilling
to help with vger related issues.
Personal experience unfortunately.
--
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / maven.pl
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services
2014-09-30 14:18 Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services Carlos Maiolino
2014-09-30 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-09-30 17:55 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
@ 2014-09-30 20:00 ` Dave Chinner
2014-09-30 20:12 ` Carlos Maiolino
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-09-30 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:18:57AM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm sorry for this kind of "fancy" question from my side, but I'm wondering why
> xfs project infra-structure (mailing list, git trees), does not use the "usual
> public" services. I mean, does anyone thought about moving xfs mailing list to
> vger.kernel.org, and the git trees to git.kernel.org?
I'm already using git.kernel.org for my master XFS trees. The ones
on oss.sgi.com are simply now downstream mirrors. There's still a
few things I need to organise (e.g. where release tarballs are put)
before we make the kernel.org trees the official source of XFS
source code.
We already have a linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org mailing list - we just
don't use it. Again, more organisation stuff to do to switch over
(i.e. forwarding from xfs@oss.sgi.com to the vger list) and then
updating documentation everywhere and getting people to start using
it.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services
2014-09-30 20:00 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2014-09-30 20:12 ` Carlos Maiolino
2014-09-30 20:42 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2014-09-30 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: xfs
Thanks dave.
Can I use your kernel.org tree from now then?
Regarding the mailing list, let me know if you need some help
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 06:00:46AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:18:57AM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm sorry for this kind of "fancy" question from my side, but I'm wondering why
> > xfs project infra-structure (mailing list, git trees), does not use the "usual
> > public" services. I mean, does anyone thought about moving xfs mailing list to
> > vger.kernel.org, and the git trees to git.kernel.org?
>
> I'm already using git.kernel.org for my master XFS trees. The ones
> on oss.sgi.com are simply now downstream mirrors. There's still a
> few things I need to organise (e.g. where release tarballs are put)
> before we make the kernel.org trees the official source of XFS
> source code.
>
> We already have a linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org mailing list - we just
> don't use it. Again, more organisation stuff to do to switch over
> (i.e. forwarding from xfs@oss.sgi.com to the vger list) and then
> updating documentation everywhere and getting people to start using
> it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
Carlos
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services
2014-09-30 20:12 ` Carlos Maiolino
@ 2014-09-30 20:42 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-09-30 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:12:45PM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> Thanks dave.
>
> Can I use your kernel.org tree from now then?
Sure - it's already the tree that is included into the linux-next
builds and the tree I ask linus to pull from...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-30 20:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-30 14:18 Why not move xfs infra-structure to "public" services Carlos Maiolino
2014-09-30 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-09-30 15:02 ` Carlos Maiolino
2014-09-30 17:55 ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2014-09-30 20:00 ` Dave Chinner
2014-09-30 20:12 ` Carlos Maiolino
2014-09-30 20:42 ` Dave Chinner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox