From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698FB7F4E for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:51:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563B08F804B for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:51:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id aRCgkSR1kQ1EsFM1 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:51:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:50:58 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: rework zero range to prevent invalid i_size updates Message-ID: <20141014005058.GH5267@dastard> References: <1413220285-24886-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> <20141014001806.GG5267@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141014001806.GG5267@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:18:06AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > I'm running 3.17 + for-next + a handful of local patches, but this > is the only patch that modifies anything in this area. I'll remove > all the other patches I have just to check.... When this is the only patch on top of 3.17+for-next it still triggers. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs