From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1F57F3F for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:17:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46259AC004 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 08:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gJel53z9PS7Y784E (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 08:17:38 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12 v2] Moving i_dquot out of struct inode Message-ID: <20141018151738.GG30355@infradead.org> References: <1412952910-7142-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20141011133452.GA29004@infradead.org> <20141017192428.GA19788@quack.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141017192428.GA19788@quack.suse.cz> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Kara Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, tytso@mit.edu, Jeff Mahoney , Dave Kleikamp , Mark Fasheh , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , Joel Becker , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Steven Whitehouse , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > I don't see the 4-bytes per inode saving, what am I missing? Frankly, I > don't see a difference in readability but since you and Al agree on that I > concede to your taste :) It's the removal of s_inode_fields that saves 4 bytes. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs