From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Tommy Wu <wu.tommy@gmail.com>
Cc: xfs <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: xfsrestore report SUCCESS but not restore all files in kernel 3.17
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:03:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141030050306.GI13323@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGdb-8dbGRu_GWB4qoeNP8Kso2hzkLcuFS9Pwtnm2xOkP2T0rQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:07:21AM +0800, Tommy Wu wrote:
> I just create a x86-64 VM (using VirtualBox 4.3.18, under windows 8).
> Install Debian jessie on it. Create a test partition in LVM for testing.
> (so I think it's not hardware issue here)
>
> test procedure:
> 1. mkfs.xfs the 1st partition in LVM
> 2. mount the 1st partition
> 3. extract linux-3.17.tar.xz to the partition
> 4. xfsdump the 1st partition
> 5. mkfs.xfs the 2nd partition in LVM
> 6. mount the 2nd partition
> 7. xfsrestore the dump file to 2nd partition
> 8. compare the file/directory in 2 partitions.
Partition sizes are roughly a 5GB source and 10GB destination.
So there's this many files in the fs:
> xfsrestore: 3054 directories and 50556 entries processed
OK, so on 3.18-rc2:
> root@debian:/mnt/xfsdump# mount /dev/debian/xfsrestore /mnt/xfsrestore
> root@debian:/mnt/xfsdump# cd /mnt/xfsrestore/
> root@debian:/mnt/xfsrestore# xfsdump -l 0 -o -p 300 -J -F -M test -L test -
> /mnt/xfsdump | gzip -qv > /mnt/xfsrestore/xfsdump.gz
....
> xfsdump: media file size 575648352 bytes
> xfsdump: dump size (non-dir files) : 560258760 bytes
These are a handful of bytes different.
> xfsdump: dump complete: 21 seconds elapsed
> xfsdump: Dump Status: SUCCESS
> 78.5%
> root@debian:/mnt/xfsrestore# ls -la
> total 120680
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 23 Oct 30 10:48 .
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Oct 30 10:37 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 123569739 Oct 30 10:48 xfsdump.gz
> root@debian:/mnt/xfsrestore# cat /mnt/xfsrestore/xfsdump.gz | gzip -dqv |
> xfsrestore -p 300 -J -t - | grep xfsrestore
and the test shows:
> xfsrestore: reading directories
> xfsrestore: 2035 directories and 33045 entries processed
A thousand less directories and 20000 less files, which doesn't make
much sense for a dump that has a few bytes difference in size.
So, I've done almost exactly the same test locally (I used the
3.18-rc2 tarball) and on both the upstream 3.18-rc2 kernel and my
current xfs-fixes-for-3.18-rc3 branch I can't reproduce your
problem:
$ find /mnt/test -type d |wc -l
3080
$ find /mnt/test |wc -l
51068
$ zcat dump.gz | sudo xfsrestore -p 300 -J - . |grep xfsrestore
.....
xfsrestore: reading directories
xfsrestore: 3080 directories and 51068 entries processed
xfsrestore: directory post-processing
xfsrestore: restoring non-directory files
xfsrestore: restore complete: 7 seconds elapsed
xfsrestore: Restore Status: SUCCESS
$ find /mnt/scratch -type d |wc -l
3080
$ find /mnt/scratch |wc -l
51069
$ ls /mnt/scratch
dump.gz linux-3.18-rc2
$
Which shows that it's working just fine. I've tried cold cache
dumps. I've tried crc enabled filesystems, I've tried a bunch of
random permutations, but I cannot get dump/restore to do what you
are seeing it do. Whatever problem you are seeing is specific to
your system.
Hmmm - can you run 'ldd xfsdump' and 'ldd xfsrestore' and paste the
output for me?
Can you also please run a full test again on a kernel built from the
current xfs-fixes-for-3.18-rc3 branch, with full dump/restore debug
enabled and send me the output? i.e.
$ xfsdump -v debug ...
and
$ xfsrestore -v debug,tree=nitty ...
They ar going to produce a lot of output, so please capture it to
files rather than trying to cut/paste output to an email.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-29 4:06 xfsrestore report SUCCESS but not restore all files in kernel 3.17 Tommy Wu
2014-10-29 4:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-29 4:27 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-29 4:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-29 4:30 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-29 4:40 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-29 6:46 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-29 7:51 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-29 9:03 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-29 9:21 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-29 10:33 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-29 10:43 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-29 12:32 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-29 19:50 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-29 20:52 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-29 21:25 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <CAGdb-8dbGRu_GWB4qoeNP8Kso2hzkLcuFS9Pwtnm2xOkP2T0rQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-30 5:03 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-10-30 8:39 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-30 10:39 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-30 23:04 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-31 0:09 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-31 1:51 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-31 3:49 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-31 4:25 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-31 4:42 ` Tommy Wu
2014-10-31 4:55 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-10-31 5:40 ` Tommy Wu
2014-11-07 1:05 ` Tommy Wu
2014-11-07 4:37 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-31 4:40 ` Tommy Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141030050306.GI13323@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=wu.tommy@gmail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox