From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/2] xfs: split metadata and log buffer completion to separate workqueues
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:48:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141128024814.GB16151@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415906641-43587-3-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:24:01PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> XFS traditionally sends all buffer I/O completion work to a single
> queue. This includes metadata buffer completion and log buffer
> completion. The log buffer completion requires a high priority queue to
> prevent stalls due to log forces getting stuck behind other queued work.
>
> Rather than continue to prioritize all buffer I/O completion due to the
> needs of log completion, split log buffer completion off to
> m_log_workqueue and move the high priority flag from m_buf_workqueue to
> m_log_workqueue.
>
> [XXX: Use of XBF_SYNCIO is purely for demonstration. Define a new flag.]
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 9 ++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 5 ++---
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index c06d790..58d729c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1050,8 +1050,15 @@ void
> xfs_buf_ioend_async(
> struct xfs_buf *bp)
> {
> + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> +
> + if (bp->b_flags & XBF_SYNCIO)
> + wq = bp->b_target->bt_mount->m_log_workqueue;
> + else
> + wq = bp->b_target->bt_mount->m_buf_workqueue;
> +
> INIT_WORK(&bp->b_iodone_work, xfs_buf_ioend_work);
> - queue_work(bp->b_target->bt_mount->m_buf_workqueue, &bp->b_iodone_work);
> + queue_work(wq, &bp->b_iodone_work);
I can see what you are doing here, but I still think it would be
better to set this up at IO submission rather than taking all those
cacheline misses chasing pointers on IO completion. Adding an extra
pointer to the struct xfs_buf is not a big deal....
Otherwise this looks fine....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-28 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-13 19:23 [PATCH v3 0/2] xfs: split up xfslogd global workqueue Brian Foster
2014-11-13 19:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] xfs: replace global xfslogd wq with per-mount wq Brian Foster
2014-11-28 2:49 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-13 19:24 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/2] xfs: split metadata and log buffer completion to separate workqueues Brian Foster
2014-11-28 2:48 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141128024814.GB16151@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox