public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: easily reproducible filesystem crash on rebuilding array
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:58:43 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141218225843.GB24183@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141218164042.15220bf3@harpe.intellique.com>

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 04:40:42PM +0100, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Wed, 17 Dec 2014 06:58:15 +1100
> Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> écrivait:
> 
> > > 
> > > The firmware is the latest available. How do I turn logging to 11
> > > please ?  
> > 
> > # echo 11 > /proc/sys/fs/xfs/error_level
> 
> OK, so now I've set the error level up, I've rerun my test without
> using LVM, and the FS crashed again, this time more seriously. Here's
> the significant exerpt from /var/log/messages:
> 
> Dec 18 03:56:05 TEST-ADAPTEC -- MARK --
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 1738 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 3.16.7-storiq64-opteron #1
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel: Hardware name: Supermicro H8SGL/H8SGL, BIOS 3.0a       05/07/2013
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel: Workqueue: xfslogd xfs_buf_iodone_work
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel:  0000000000000000 ffff88040e2d5080 ffffffff814ca287 ffff88040e2d5120
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel:  ffffffff811fbb0d ffff8800df925940 ffff88040e2d5120 ffff8800df925940
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel:  ffffffff810705a4 0000000000013f00 000000000deed450 ffff88040deed450
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel: Call Trace:
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel:  [<ffffffff814ca287>] ? dump_stack+0x41/0x51
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel:  [<ffffffff811fbb0d>] ? xfs_buf_iodone_work+0x8d/0xb0
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel:  [<ffffffff810705a4>] ? process_one_work+0x174/0x420
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel:  [<ffffffff81070c4b>] ? worker_thread+0x10b/0x500
> Dec 18 04:00:04 TEST-ADAPTEC kernel:  [<ffffffff814cc290>] ? __schedule+0x2e0/0x750

Where's the XFS error output? This is just the output from the
dump_stack() call in the xfs error message code...

Still, that's implying a write IO error being reporte din IO
completion, not a read error, and that's different to the previous
issue you've reported. It's also indicative of an error coming from
the storage, not XFS...

Do these problems *only* happen during or after a RAID rebuild?

> Phase 7 - verify and correct link counts...
> resetting inode 4294866029 nlinks from 2 to 5
> resetting inode 150323855504 nlinks from 13 to 12
> Metadata corruption detected at block 0x10809dc640/0x1000
> libxfs_writebufr: write verifer failed on bno 0x10809dc640/0x1000
> Metadata corruption detected at block 0x10809dc640/0x1000
> libxfs_writebufr: write verifer failed on bno 0x10809dc640/0x1000
> done

I'd suggest you should be upgrading xfsprogs, because that's an
error that shouldn't happen at the end of a repair. If the latest
version (3.2.2) doesn't fix this problem, then please send me a
compressed metadump so I can work out what corruption xfs_repair
isn't fixing properly.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-18 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-11 11:39 easily reproducible filesystem crash on rebuilding array Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-11 15:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-12-15 12:07 ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-15 12:25   ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-15 20:10     ` Dave Chinner
2014-12-16  7:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-16 11:38         ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-16 17:21           ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-16 11:34       ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-16 19:58         ` Dave Chinner
2014-12-17 11:21           ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-18 15:40           ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-18 22:58             ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-12-19 11:57               ` Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-19 23:06                 ` Dave Chinner
2014-12-16 11:08     ` easily reproducible filesystem crash on rebuilding array [XFS bug in my book] Emmanuel Florac
2014-12-16 20:04       ` Dave Chinner
2015-01-13 11:21 ` easily reproducible filesystem crash on rebuilding array Emmanuel Florac
2015-01-13 13:59   ` Emmanuel Florac
     [not found] <CAH-PCH7W4yTDRhAiKQwN_wQJMx2sTitQYrLNPcLYHvJRucXBjA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-09-17  6:17 ` Emmanuel Florac
2015-09-17  7:21   ` Ferenc Kovacs
2015-09-17 11:17     ` Emmanuel Florac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141218225843.GB24183@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox