From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E737F50 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:27:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97757AC001 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id pacGow4wKlR4pB5M for ; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:27:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:27:29 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: XFS corrupt after RAID failure and resync Message-ID: <20150107002729.GB25000@dastard> References: <44b127de199c445fa12c3b832a05f108@000s-ex-hub-qs1.unimelb.edu.au> <8cc9a649ec2240faa4e38fd742437546@000S-EX-HUB-NP2.unimelb.edu.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: David Raffelt Cc: "stefanrin@gmail.com" , Brian Foster , "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:47:00AM +1100, David Raffelt wrote: > Hi Brain, > Below is the root inode data. I'm currently running xfs_metadump and will > send you a link to the file. > Cheers! > David > > > > > xfs_db> sb > xfs_db> p rootino > rootino = 1024 > xfs_db> inode 1024 > xfs_db> p > core.magic = 0 > core.mode = 0 > core.version = 0 > core.format = 0 (dev) It's a zero'd block. Even an unallocated inode should have the magic number, inode version and data fork format stamped in it. This is something we typically see when RAID rebuilds have not worked correctly, even though they say they were "successful".... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs