From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85C47F4E for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:38:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC31AC008 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:38:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id uLwZejZhkRqxG4zP for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:38:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:38:26 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/17 v3] quota: Unify VFS and XFS quota interfaces Message-ID: <20150121213826.GL16510@dastard> References: <1421412471-4747-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1421412471-4747-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 01:47:34PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > Hello, > > this is another iteration of patches to unify VFS and XFS quota interfaces so > that XFS quotactls work for filesystems with VFS quotas and vice versa. This > is useful so that userspace doesn't have to care that much about which > filesystem it is using at least when using basic quota functionality. In > particular we should be able to reuse project quota tests in xfstests for ext4. > > The patches are based on quota cleanup series [1] and XFS cleanup series [2] > I've sent previously and based on 3.19-rc4 + for-next branch of XFS tree. I > could further split this series into per-quotactl series but frankly I don't > think it will help reviewers in any way (the patches in the current series are > already ordered by quotactl). Hi Jan, Do you have a this series in a git tree somewhere so it's easy to merge and test? > All the comments to the first version of the series are hopefully addressed, > except for Dave's request to reduce number of copying of dquot information - > I have benchmarked that reducing number of copies from 3 to 2 brings just 2% > improvement in speed in my test setup and getting quota information isn't IMHO > so performance critical that it would be worth the complications of the code. I think the numbers address my concern adequately ;) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs