From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dewangga Bachrul Alam <dewanggaba@xtremenitro.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Change sector size on existing partition
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:06:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150123140611.GB2864@laptop.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C250D3.9030706@xtremenitro.org>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:46:59PM +0700, Dewangga Bachrul Alam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The device reported like this :
>
> $ blockdev --getss --getpbsz --getiomin --getioopt /dev/dm-3
> 512
> 4096
> 4096
> 0
>
What is dm-3? Is that a logical volume based on a volume group on top of
your physical array? It might be good to get the equivalent data for the
array device (md?) and at least one of the physical devices (sd?).
> Then, the sector size should be 512. Don't know why it can be 4096. :( I
> will try to backup them and reformat. Any suggestion for formating on
> raid-10 array? The device is 4 x 1TB drives.
>
According to the above you have 4k physical sectors and 512b logical
sectors. IIUC, this means mkfs will use the physical size by default,
but you can specify and the device can handle down to 512 sectors.
>From skimming through the link posted earlier, it sounds like you have
an application that has a hardcoded dependency on 512b direct I/O
requirements (e.g., buffer alignment) rather than being configurable..?
Can you disable direct I/O and verify whether that works? Regardless, it
might be wise to test out this 512b sector configuration (perhaps with a
single or spare drive?) and verify this fixes the problem you're trying
to solve before reconfiguring everything.
Brian
> On 01/23/2015 08:39 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:04:44PM +0700, Dewangga Bachrul Alam wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm new to XFS, I have RAID-10 array with 4 disk, when I check with
> >> xfs_info, the information print like this.
> >>
> >> $ xfs_info /var/lib/mysql
> >> meta-data=/dev/mapper/vg_catalystdb01-lv_database isize=256
> >> agcount=16, agsize=1600000 blks
> >> = sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=0
> >> data = bsize=4096 blocks=25600000, imaxpct=25
> >> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
> >> naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
> >> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=12500, version=2
> >> = sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
> >> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
> >>
> >> Is it possible to change `sectsz` value to 512 without re-format it? Or
> >> any suggestion? I have issue with current sector size, my TokuDB
> >> engines[1] can't start because of this.
> >>
> >
> > The only way to set things like sector size, block size, etc. is to
> > reformat. I believe the default sector size is dependent on the physical
> > device. You might want to report the following from your array device
> > and perhaps from some or all of the member devices:
> >
> > blockdev --getss --getpbsz --getiomin --getioopt <device>
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >> [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tokudb-user/kvQFJLCmKwo
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> xfs mailing list
> >> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> >> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 13:04 Change sector size on existing partition Dewangga Bachrul Alam
2015-01-23 13:39 ` Brian Foster
2015-01-23 13:46 ` Dewangga Bachrul Alam
2015-01-23 14:06 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2015-01-23 14:35 ` Dewangga Bachrul Alam
2015-01-23 15:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-01-23 15:40 ` Dewangga Bachrul Alam
2015-01-23 15:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-01-23 16:26 ` Dewangga Bachrul Alam
2015-01-23 16:44 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150123140611.GB2864@laptop.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=dewanggaba@xtremenitro.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox