public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: iustin@k1024.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: fix behaviour of XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR on directories
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:35:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150129153549.GI17652@laptop.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422328486-24661-10-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:14:46PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Iustin Pop <iustin@k1024.org>
> 
> Currently, the ioctl handling code for XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR treats all
> targets as regular files: it refuses to change the extent size if
> extents are allocated. This is wrong for directories, as there the
> extent size is only used as a default for children.
> 
> The patch fixes this issue and improves validation of flag
> combinations:
> 
> - only disallow extent size changes after extents have been allocated
>   for regular files
> - only allow XFS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE for regular files
> - only allow XFS_XFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT for directories
> - automatically clear the flags if the extent size is zero
> 
> Thanks to Dave Chinner for guidance on the proper fix for this issue.
> 
> [dchinner: ported changes onto cleanup series. Makes changes clear
> 	   and obvious.]
> [dchinner: added comments documenting validity checking rules.]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Iustin Pop <iustin@k1024.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

>  fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index 561d142..5d9dc69 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -1098,6 +1098,20 @@ out_cancel:
>  	return ERR_PTR(error);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * extent size hint validation is somewhat cumbersome. Rules are:
> + *
> + * 1. extent size hint is only valid for directories and regular files
> + * 2. XFS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE is only valid for regular files
> + * 3. XFS_XFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT is only valid for directories.
> + * 4. can only be changed on regular files if no extents are allocated
> + * 5. can be changed on directories at any time
> + * 6. extsize hint of 0 turns off hints, clears inode flags.
> + * 7. Extent size must be a multiple of the appropriate block size.
> + * 8. for non-realtime files, the extent size hint must be limited
> + *    to half the AG size to avoid alignment extending the extent beyond the
> + *    limits of the AG.
> + */
>  int
>  xfs_ioctl_setattr_check_extsize(
>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
> @@ -1105,20 +1119,17 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_check_extsize(
>  {
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
>  
> -	/* Can't change extent size if any extents are allocated. */
> -	if (ip->i_d.di_nextents &&
> +	if ((fa->fsx_xflags & XFS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE) && !S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if ((fa->fsx_xflags & XFS_XFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT) &&
> +	    !S_ISDIR(ip->i_d.di_mode))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode) && ip->i_d.di_nextents &&
>  	    ((ip->i_d.di_extsize << mp->m_sb.sb_blocklog) != fa->fsx_extsize))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Extent size must be a multiple of the appropriate block size, if set
> -	 * at all. It must also be smaller than the maximum extent size
> -	 * supported by the filesystem.
> -	 *
> -	 * Also, for non-realtime files, limit the extent size hint to half the
> -	 * size of the AGs in the filesystem so alignment doesn't result in
> -	 * extents larger than an AG.
> -	 */
>  	if (fa->fsx_extsize != 0) {
>  		xfs_extlen_t    size;
>  		xfs_fsblock_t   extsize_fsb;
> @@ -1138,7 +1149,9 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_check_extsize(
>  
>  		if (fa->fsx_extsize % size)
>  			return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	} else
> +		fa->fsx_xflags &= ~(XFS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE | XFS_XFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1169,8 +1182,6 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_check_projid(
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -
> -
>  STATIC int
>  xfs_ioctl_setattr(
>  	xfs_inode_t		*ip,
> -- 
> 2.0.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-29 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-27  3:14 [PATCH 0/9] xfs: xfs_ioctl_setxattr rework Dave Chinner
2015-01-27  3:14 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: FSX_NONBLOCK is not used Dave Chinner
2015-01-29 15:33   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-27  3:14 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: separate xflags from xfs_ioctl_setattr Dave Chinner
2015-01-29 15:34   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-27  3:14 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: factor out xfs_ioctl_setattr transaciton preamble Dave Chinner
2015-01-29 15:34   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-27  3:14 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: disaggregate xfs_ioctl_setattr Dave Chinner
2015-01-29 15:34   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-27  3:14 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: kill xfs_ioctl_setattr behaviour mask Dave Chinner
2015-01-29 15:35   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-27  3:14 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: XFS_IOCTL_SETXATTR can run in user namespaces Dave Chinner
2015-01-29 15:35   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-29 23:53     ` Dave Chinner
2015-01-30  3:04       ` Brian Foster
2015-01-30  7:44         ` Dave Chinner
2015-01-27  3:14 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs; factor extsize hint checking out of xfs_ioctl_setattr Dave Chinner
2015-01-29 15:35   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-27  3:14 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs; factor projid " Dave Chinner
2015-01-29 15:35   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-27  3:14 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: fix behaviour of XFS_IOC_FSSETXATTR on directories Dave Chinner
2015-01-29 15:35   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2015-01-29 15:38 ` [PATCH 0/9] xfs: xfs_ioctl_setxattr rework Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150129153549.GI17652@laptop.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=iustin@k1024.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox