From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043EB7FA9 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 01:30:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24298F804B for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 23:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id WrPkScWsHkYAL2uk (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 23:30:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:30:24 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] xfs: pass a 64-bit count argument to xfs_iomap_write_unwritten Message-ID: <20150202073024.GA9399@lst.de> References: <1421925006-24231-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1421925006-24231-17-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150129205232.GB11064@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150129205232.GB11064@fieldses.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:52:32PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Who can give us ACKs on these last five fs/xfs patches? (And is it > going to cause trouble if they go in through the nfsd tree?) We'd need ACKs from Dave. He already has pulled in two patches so we might run into some conflicts. Maybe the best idea is to add the exportfs patch to both the XFS and nfsd trees, so each of them can pull in the rest? Or we could commit the two XFS preparation patches to both tree and get something that compiles and works in the nfsd tree. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs