Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: struct xfs_sb is no longer tied to the on-disk format

Christoph Hellwig
2015-02-03T21:37:49Z

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:30:21AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > I'd expect to move it close to stuct xfs_mount, and maybe even merge
> > it into that in the long run.
>
> I guess moving the structure there is fine, but we still want all
> the version functions to be shared with userspace, which then makes
> for an interesting set of dependencies. Any other ideas?

Are they really worth the sharing? If they are worth it we'll
need somethign that can expect a xfs_sb/xfs_mount to be defined.