From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BE6802D for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:04:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDDC304062 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:04:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oYHaNyCnaAJIvfrG for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:04:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:58:50 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] xfs: use generic percpu counters for icsb Message-ID: <20150203215850.GK4251@dastard> References: <1422826983-29570-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20150203215043.GA21885@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150203215043.GA21885@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:50:43PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > FYI, I think we should just get rid of the horrible xfs_mod_incore_sb(_batch) > interface as part of this. The patch below applies on top of your > series. I like it - getting rid of those field bitmasks altogether is a great result. It probably needs to be split up into several patches, though. I can do that over the next few days and add it to the patchset if you want. The icsb changes are 3.21 material, anyway, so there's no real hurry on this.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs