From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D057802D for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 16:02:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7088F8081 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:02:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VGwb5JAacBEfiWkc (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:02:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:02:08 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] xfs: use generic percpu counters for icsb Message-ID: <20150203220208.GA10498@infradead.org> References: <1422826983-29570-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20150203215043.GA21885@infradead.org> <20150203215850.GK4251@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150203215850.GK4251@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:58:50AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > It probably needs to be split up into several patches, though. I can > do that over the next few days and add it to the patchset if you > want. The icsb changes are 3.21 material, anyway, so there's no > real hurry on this.... Might be best if you fold the changes for the three counters that your series touch into those patches. Then I can split the remainder up into one for the real time extents as the only one called from code outside the transction subsystem, and then the final one to redo the batch changess from the transaction code. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs