From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 V2] xfs: use generic percpu counters for icsb
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:18:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150205221825.GU4251@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150205140840.GB31625@laptop.bfoster>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 09:08:40AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:54:02AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This is the second version of the generic per-cpu counter rework
> > patch series. The first version can be found here:
> >
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-02/msg00000.html
> >
> > New in V2:
> >
> > - drop the moving of the struct xfs_sb to xfs_super.h
> > - fixed all the little things that Christoph and Brian noted.
> > - keep the per-cpu counters in the struct xfs_mount and keep the
> > functions to sync them with the struct xfs_sb values when read
> > from disk or written to disk.
> > - integrated Christoph Hellwig's additional cleanup patch. This was
> > done by:
> > - intergating xfs_mod_XXX factoring into the relevant percpu
> > counter conversion patch
> > - separating out xfs_mod_frextents into it's won patch
> > - separating out the replacement of
> > xfs_mod_incore_sb_batched
> > - doing all the now unused API removal in a separate patch
> >
> > The series passes xfstests without regressions, and no scalability
> > issues have been seen in my performance tests on a 16p VM. SGI - you
> > still need to test this, though. :)
> >
> > Thoughts, comments?
> >
>
> All in all this looks pretty good to me save a couple notes pointed out
> in the patches. In a quick test, this handles the imaxct overshoot
> problem Eric noted much better than the current implementation. That
> said, it's still not precise.
Right.
> My understanding is that's fine, but I wonder if we want to tack on a
> variant of Eric's original patch as well so when we still do overshoot
> imaxpct (albeit by much less than before: I reproduce an overshoot of
> <100 inodes vs several thousand) we at least report an accurate inode
> count. Thoughts?
Yes, Eric's patch is still necessary.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-05 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 20:54 [PATCH 0/7 V2] xfs: use generic percpu counters for icsb Dave Chinner
2015-02-04 20:54 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: use generic percpu counters for inode counter Dave Chinner
2015-02-05 14:09 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-23 20:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-02-04 20:54 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: use generic percpu counters for free " Dave Chinner
2015-02-05 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-23 20:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-02-04 20:54 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: use generic percpu counters for free block counter Dave Chinner
2015-02-05 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-05 14:18 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-23 20:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-02-04 20:54 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: Remove icsb infrastructure Dave Chinner
2015-02-05 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-23 20:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-02-04 20:54 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: introduce xfs_mod_frextents Dave Chinner
2015-02-05 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-23 21:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-02-04 20:54 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: replace xfs_mod_incore_sb_batched Dave Chinner
2015-02-05 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-05 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-02-05 14:27 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-04 20:54 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: remove xfs_mod_incore_sb API Dave Chinner
2015-02-05 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-05 14:08 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] xfs: use generic percpu counters for icsb Brian Foster
2015-02-05 22:18 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150205221825.GU4251@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox