From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E3A8017 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:37:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8466E304043 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:37:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id braYzCBwPzBgwZUd for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:37:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:37:21 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] xfsprogs/repair: fix a couple large block size alignment issues Message-ID: <20150205233720.GV4251@dastard> References: <1423173023-54866-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1423173023-54866-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 04:50:21PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > Hi all, > > This is just a couple fixes for issues I came across while playing with > larger block and inode sizes on a ppc64 box... Yup, fixes look sane. I'll test and pull them in. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs