From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D837F50 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:49:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7977304043 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:49:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JMtEzjARWs0jybJI (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:49:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:49:32 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: clarify async write failure ratelimit message Message-ID: <20150223204932.GD13522@infradead.org> References: <54EB7BDB.7080202@redhat.com> <54EB7D2F.3030305@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54EB7D2F.3030305@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs