From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4E07F47 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:49:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A66B8F8035 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id mWhonFzGAp6t44wP (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:49:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:49:26 +0000 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures occur Message-ID: <20150312184925.GH3406@suse.de> References: <20150307163657.GA9702@gmail.com> <20150308100223.GC15487@gmail.com> <20150309112936.GD26657@destitution> <20150309191943.GF26657@destitution> <20150312131045.GE3406@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux-MM , Aneesh Kumar , Andrew Morton , ppc-dev , Ingo Molnar On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:20:36AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > I believe you're correct and it matches what was observed. I'm still > > travelling and wireless is dirt but managed to queue a test using pmd_dirty > > Ok, thanks. > > I'm not entirely happy with that change, and I suspect the whole > heuristic should be looked at much more (maybe it should also look at > whether it's executable, for example), but it's a step in the right > direction. > I can follow up when I'm back in work properly. As you have already pulled this in directly, can you also consider pulling in "mm: thp: return the correct value for change_huge_pmd" please? The other two patches were very minor can be resent through the normal paths later. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs