[PATCH 04/13] xfs_db: nlink fields are valid for di_version == 3, too

Eric Sandeen
2015-03-17T20:33:23Z

Printing inodes with di_version == 3 skips the nlink
fields, because they are only printed if di_version == 2.
This was intended to separate them from di_version == 1,
but it mistakenly excluded di_version == 3, which also contains
these fields.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
db/inode.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/db/inode.c b/db/inode.c
index 982acb7..c26e1a0 100644
--- a/db/inode.c
+++ b/db/inode.c
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ inode_core_nlinkv2_count(
ASSERT(startoff == 0);
ASSERT(obj == iocur_top->data);
dic = obj;
- return dic->di_version == 2;
+ return dic->di_version >= 2;
}

static int
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ inode_core_onlink_count(
ASSERT(startoff == 0);
ASSERT(obj == iocur_top->data);
dic = obj;
- return dic->di_version == 2;
+ return dic->di_version >= 2;
}

static int
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ inode_core_projid_count(
ASSERT(startoff == 0);
ASSERT(obj == iocur_top->data);
dic = obj;
- return dic->di_version == 2;
+ return dic->di_version >= 2;
}

static int
--
1.7.1