From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595C17F37 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:12:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF93EAC003 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 03:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id NqLJjTBwOI1w1pNk (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 03:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:12:46 +0000 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures occur Message-ID: <20150320101246.GF3087@suse.de> References: <20150317205104.GA28621@dastard> <20150317220840.GC28621@dastard> <20150319224143.GI10105@dastard> <20150320002311.GG28621@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux-MM , Aneesh Kumar , Andrew Morton , ppc-dev , Ingo Molnar On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:29:47PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > And the VM_WRITE test should be stable and not have any subtle > interaction with the other changes that the numa pte things > introduced. It would be good to see if the profiles then pop something > *else* up as the performance difference (which I'm sure will remain, > since the 7m50s was so far off). > As a side-note, I did test a patch that checked pte_write and preserved it across both faults and setting the protections. It did not alter migration activity much but there was a drop in minor faults - 20% drop in autonumabench, 58% drop in xfsrepair workload. I'm assuming this is due to refaults to mark pages writable. The patch looks and is hacky so I won't post it to save people bleaching their eyes. I'll spend some time soon (hopefully today) at a smooth way of falling through to WP checks after trapping a NUMA fault. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs