From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Joe Landman <joe.landman@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, xfs <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: interesting MD-xfs bug
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:10:35 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150409231035.GI13731@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150409225322.GH13731@dastard>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 08:53:22AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 06:20:26PM -0400, Joe Landman wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/09/2015 06:18 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > >On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 05:02:33PM -0400, Joe Landman wrote:
> > >>If I build an MD raid0 with a non power of 2 chunk size, it appears
> > >>that I can mkfs.xfs a file system, but it doesn't show up in blkid
> > >>and is not mountable. Yet, using a power of 2 chunk size, this does
> > >>work correctly. This is kernel 3.18.9.
> > >>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >That looks more like a blkid or udev problem. try using blkid -p so
> > >that it doesn't look up the cache but directly probes devices for
> > >the signatures. strace might tell you a bit more, too. And if the
> > >filesystem mounts, then it definitely isn't an XFS problem ;)
> >
> > Thats the thing, it didn't mount, even when I used the device name
> > directly.
>
> Ok, that's interesting. Let me see if I can reproduce it locally. If
> you don't hear otherwise, tracing would still be useful. Thanks for
> the bug report, Joe.
No luck - md doesn't allow the device to be activated on 4.0-rc7:
$ sudo mdadm --version
mdadm - v3.3.2 - 21st August 2014
$ uname -a
Linux test4 4.0.0-rc7-dgc+ #882 SMP Fri Apr 10 08:50:52 AEST 2015 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ sudo wipefs -a /dev/vd[ab]
/dev/vda: 4 bytes were erased at offset 0x00001000 (linux_raid_member): fc 4e 2b a9
/dev/vdb: 4 bytes were erased at offset 0x00001000 (linux_raid_member): fc 4e 2b a9
$ sudo mdadm --create /dev/md20 --level=0 --metadata=1.2 --chunk=1152 --auto=yes --raid-disks=2 /dev/vd[ab]
mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Invalid argument
Problem may be that chunk size is not a power of 2
$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
unused devices: <none>
$
So I can't actually reproduce what you are seeing because MD doesn't
allow the device to be activated and so mdadm tears it back down.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-09 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-09 21:02 interesting MD-xfs bug Joe Landman
2015-04-09 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-09 22:20 ` Joe Landman
2015-04-09 22:53 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-09 23:10 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-04-09 23:36 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-10 1:31 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-10 3:22 ` NeilBrown
2015-04-10 6:05 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-10 4:43 ` Roman Mamedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150409231035.GI13731@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=joe.landman@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox