public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: move DIO mapping size calculation
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:24:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150414142402.GC36198@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428996411-1507-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:26:45PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> The mapping size calculation is done last in __xfs_get_blocks(), but
> we are going to need the actual mapping size we will use to map the
> direct IO correctly in xfs_map_direct(). Factor out the calculation
> for code clarity, and move the call to be the first operation in
> mapping the extent to the returned buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index 5f7ddd5..8f63520 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -1249,6 +1249,47 @@ xfs_map_direct(
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +
> +/*
> + * If this is O_DIRECT or the mpage code calling tell them how large the mapping
> + * is, so that we can avoid repeated get_blocks calls.
> + *
> + * If the mapping spans EOF, then we have to break the mapping up as the mapping
> + * for blocks beyond EOF must be marked new so that sub block regions can be
> + * correctly zeroed. We can't do this for mappings within EOF unless the mapping
> + * was just allocated or is unwritten, otherwise the callers would overwrite
> + * existing data with zeros. Hence we have to split the mapping into a range up
> + * to and including EOF, and a second mapping for beyond EOF.
> + */
> +static void
> +xfs_map_trim_size(
> +	struct inode		*inode,
> +	sector_t		iblock,
> +	struct buffer_head	*bh_result,
> +	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	*imap,
> +	xfs_off_t		offset,
> +	ssize_t			size)
> +{
> +	xfs_off_t		mapping_size;
> +
> +	mapping_size = imap->br_startoff + imap->br_blockcount - iblock;
> +	mapping_size <<= inode->i_blkbits;
> +
> +	ASSERT(mapping_size > 0);
> +	if (mapping_size > size)
> +		mapping_size = size;
> +	if (offset < i_size_read(inode) &&
> +	    offset + mapping_size >= i_size_read(inode)) {
> +		/* limit mapping to block that spans EOF */
> +		mapping_size = roundup_64(i_size_read(inode) - offset,
> +					  1 << inode->i_blkbits);
> +	}
> +	if (mapping_size > LONG_MAX)
> +		mapping_size = LONG_MAX;
> +
> +	bh_result->b_size = mapping_size;
> +}
> +
>  STATIC int
>  __xfs_get_blocks(
>  	struct inode		*inode,
> @@ -1347,6 +1388,11 @@ __xfs_get_blocks(
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* trim mapping down to size requested */
> +	if (direct || size > (1 << inode->i_blkbits))
> +		xfs_map_trim_size(inode, iblock, bh_result,
> +				  &imap, offset, size);
> +
>  	if (imap.br_startblock != HOLESTARTBLOCK &&
>  	    imap.br_startblock != DELAYSTARTBLOCK &&
>  	    (create || !ISUNWRITTEN(&imap))) {
> @@ -1388,39 +1434,6 @@ __xfs_get_blocks(
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * If this is O_DIRECT or the mpage code calling tell them how large
> -	 * the mapping is, so that we can avoid repeated get_blocks calls.
> -	 *
> -	 * If the mapping spans EOF, then we have to break the mapping up as the
> -	 * mapping for blocks beyond EOF must be marked new so that sub block
> -	 * regions can be correctly zeroed. We can't do this for mappings within
> -	 * EOF unless the mapping was just allocated or is unwritten, otherwise
> -	 * the callers would overwrite existing data with zeros. Hence we have
> -	 * to split the mapping into a range up to and including EOF, and a
> -	 * second mapping for beyond EOF.
> -	 */
> -	if (direct || size > (1 << inode->i_blkbits)) {
> -		xfs_off_t		mapping_size;
> -
> -		mapping_size = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount - iblock;
> -		mapping_size <<= inode->i_blkbits;
> -
> -		ASSERT(mapping_size > 0);
> -		if (mapping_size > size)
> -			mapping_size = size;
> -		if (offset < i_size_read(inode) &&
> -		    offset + mapping_size >= i_size_read(inode)) {
> -			/* limit mapping to block that spans EOF */
> -			mapping_size = roundup_64(i_size_read(inode) - offset,
> -						  1 << inode->i_blkbits);
> -		}
> -		if (mapping_size > LONG_MAX)
> -			mapping_size = LONG_MAX;
> -
> -		bh_result->b_size = mapping_size;
> -	}
> -
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_unlock:
> -- 
> 2.0.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-14 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-14  7:26 [PATCH 0/8 v2] xfs: fix direct IO completion issues Dave Chinner
2015-04-14  7:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: factor DIO write mapping from get_blocks Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 14:23   ` Brian Foster
2015-04-14 20:06     ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-14  7:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: move DIO mapping size calculation Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 14:24   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2015-04-14  7:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: DIO needs an ioend for writes Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 14:24   ` Brian Foster
2015-04-14  7:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: handle DIO overwrite EOF update completion correctly Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 14:35   ` Brian Foster
2015-04-14 15:35     ` Brian Foster
2015-04-14 20:12     ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-14  7:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: DIO writes within EOF don't need an ioend Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 14:35   ` Brian Foster
2015-04-14 20:18     ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-14  7:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: DIO write completion size updates race Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 14:35   ` Brian Foster
2015-04-14  7:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: direct IO EOF zeroing needs to drain AIO Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 14:35   ` Brian Foster
2015-04-14  7:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: using generic_file_direct_write() is unnecessary Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 14:35   ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150414142402.GC36198@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox