public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal/RFC: new metadata-specific UUID for V5 supers
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:27:56 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150429212756.GW15810@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5541253D.4090701@sandeen.net>

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 01:38:53PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/27/15 9:06 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On 4/27/15 8:20 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > 
> >> I think that labels are a far better way of dealing with this
> >> problem. Get rid of the UUID mount checking (and hence the nouuid
> >> mount option), and tell people to use by-label instead of by-uuid to
> >> identify their filesystems when doing clones and snapshots. Labels
> >> make it much easier for humans to identify the filesystem than
> >> UUIDs...
> > 
> > I suppose so.  Withdrawn.  ;)
> 
> One more thought.  ;)
> 
> It'd be quite possible to keep defaults compatible with old kernels,
> and only set the new feature if/when a user requests a UUID change.
> 
> If UUID changes are rare, it'll rarely matter; if they are required,
> it'll be possible.  I might send a patch just to make the discussion
> a bit more concrete.

Yes, we have precedence for doing things like that - v2 inodes,
attr2, etc. See what you come up with ;)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-29 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-27 22:10 Proposal/RFC: new metadata-specific UUID for V5 supers Eric Sandeen
2015-04-27 23:37 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-28  0:52   ` Eric Sandeen
2015-04-28  1:20     ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-28  1:35       ` Carlos E. R.
2015-04-28  1:42         ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-28  2:06       ` Eric Sandeen
2015-04-29 18:38         ` Eric Sandeen
2015-04-29 21:27           ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-04-30  4:50 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] xfs: add sb_meta_uuid field to superblock Eric Sandeen
2015-04-30  5:07   ` Eric Sandeen
2015-04-30  4:55 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] xfsprogs: add support for sb_meta_uuid Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150429212756.GW15810@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox