From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7502E7F3F for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 02:23:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C80B304048 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 00:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7LfWFjRktW6u1PCB for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 00:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:23:35 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs: master branch updated to v3.2.3-rc1 Message-ID: <20150511072335.GC15721@dastard> References: <20150511005524.GE16689@dastard> <20150511053523.GA29703@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150511053523.GA29703@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:35:23PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:55:25AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > The xfsprogs repository at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsprogs has > > just been updated. This update is the first candidate for a > > v3.2.3 release, so please test and report any problems you find. > > > > The new head of the master branch is commit: > > > > c8c0837 xfsprogs: update for 3.2.3-rc1 release > > FYI, I don't think enabling v5 file system without at least a minor > version bump makes sense. While I'm not fan of release number inflation > this might even be a case for a major number bump to 4.x. I don't really think it is necessary. SLES 12 is already using CRCs as the default XFS configuration for filesystems created by YaST, so the cat is already out of the bag. And, historically speaking, changing mkfs defaults has never been considered a compelling reason to do a major/minor version bump so I haven't even bothered trying to argue for that as I've never been successful in the past... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs