[ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to cddc116

[ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to cddc116

[Dave Chinner]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1386 bytes --]

Hi folks,

The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git

has just been updated.

The new head of the for-next branch is commit:

cddc116 xfs: xfs_iozero can return positive errno

New Commits:

Dave Chinner (5):
      [80188b0] percpu_counter: batch size aware __percpu_counter_compare()
      [8c1903d] xfs: inode and free block counters need to use __percpu_counter_compare
      [6dea405] xfs: extent size hints can round up extents past MAXEXTLEN
      [6dfe5a0] xfs: xfs_attr_inactive leaves inconsistent attr fork state behind
      [cddc116] xfs: xfs_iozero can return positive errno

George Wang (1):
      [74f9ce1] xfs: use percpu_counter_read_positive for mp->m_icount


Code Diffstat:

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c  |  8 ++--
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr_leaf.h  |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c       | 31 ++++++++++------
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c     |  9 +++--
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_inactive.c     | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c              |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c             | 12 ++----
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c             | 34 ++++++++++-------
 include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 13 ++++++-
 lib/percpu_counter.c           |  6 +--
 10 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to cddc116

[Dave Chinner]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 601 bytes --]

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:53:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git
> 
> has just been updated.
> 
> The new head of the for-next branch is commit:
> 
> cddc116 xfs: xfs_iozero can return positive errno

Note: i just updated it again with a patch I missed in the
xfs-for-linus-v4.1-rc6 branch:

Brian Foster (1):
      [22419ac] xfs: fix broken i_nlink accounting for whiteout tmpfile inode

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to cddc116

[Brian Foster]

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:21:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:53:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git
> > 
> > has just been updated.
> > 
> > The new head of the for-next branch is commit:
> > 
> > cddc116 xfs: xfs_iozero can return positive errno
> 
> Note: i just updated it again with a patch I missed in the
> xfs-for-linus-v4.1-rc6 branch:
> 
> Brian Foster (1):
>       [22419ac] xfs: fix broken i_nlink accounting for whiteout tmpfile inode
> 

Any word on the following two as well?

http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-April/041504.html
http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-May/041582.html

Brian

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com



> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to cddc116

[Dave Chinner]

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:05:49AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:21:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:53:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > > 
> > > The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at
> > > 
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git
> > > 
> > > has just been updated.
> > > 
> > > The new head of the for-next branch is commit:
> > > 
> > > cddc116 xfs: xfs_iozero can return positive errno
> > 
> > Note: i just updated it again with a patch I missed in the
> > xfs-for-linus-v4.1-rc6 branch:
> > 
> > Brian Foster (1):
> >       [22419ac] xfs: fix broken i_nlink accounting for whiteout tmpfile inode
> > 
> 
> Any word on the following two as well?
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-April/041504.html
> http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-May/041582.html

I've got them queued up for the 4.2 cycle (haven't pushed the branch
yet) because I didn't think they were really critical.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to cddc116

[Brian Foster]

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 08:31:05AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:05:49AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:21:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:53:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > > 
> > > > The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at
> > > > 
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git
> > > > 
> > > > has just been updated.
> > > > 
> > > > The new head of the for-next branch is commit:
> > > > 
> > > > cddc116 xfs: xfs_iozero can return positive errno
> > > 
> > > Note: i just updated it again with a patch I missed in the
> > > xfs-for-linus-v4.1-rc6 branch:
> > > 
> > > Brian Foster (1):
> > >       [22419ac] xfs: fix broken i_nlink accounting for whiteout tmpfile inode
> > > 
> > 
> > Any word on the following two as well?
> > 
> > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-April/041504.html
> > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-May/041582.html
> 
> I've got them queued up for the 4.2 cycle (haven't pushed the branch
> yet) because I didn't think they were really critical.
> 

Sounds good, just making sure they weren't lost. Thanks!

Brian

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs