From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279C57F3F for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 17:31:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082958F8039 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 15:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id pSpiv8oTKV6kdu9J for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 15:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 08:31:05 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to cddc116 Message-ID: <20150529223105.GC24666@dastard> References: <20150528215309.GA15721@dastard> <20150528222109.GC4316@dastard> <20150529120549.GA36053@bfoster.bfoster> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150529120549.GA36053@bfoster.bfoster> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:05:49AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:21:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:53:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git > > > > > > has just been updated. > > > > > > The new head of the for-next branch is commit: > > > > > > cddc116 xfs: xfs_iozero can return positive errno > > > > Note: i just updated it again with a patch I missed in the > > xfs-for-linus-v4.1-rc6 branch: > > > > Brian Foster (1): > > [22419ac] xfs: fix broken i_nlink accounting for whiteout tmpfile inode > > > > Any word on the following two as well? > > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-April/041504.html > http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2015-May/041582.html I've got them queued up for the 4.2 cycle (haven't pushed the branch yet) because I didn't think they were really critical. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs