Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: validate transaction header length on log recovery

Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-21T09:27:24Z

This looks sensible to me, but I still can't make sense of the old
code which just conditionally copied it even after taking a brief
look at the pre-git history of this code. Does anyone understand why
the code was like this? Fixing code that seems to have had an
intention I can't make sense of always feel dangerous.