From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE017F69 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:19:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD5730404E for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id YHFJOAjhN9cSEMmb (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:19:20 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Prefix LIST_... macros to XFS_LIST_... Message-ID: <20150726161920.GB29329@infradead.org> References: <1436964412-12093-1-git-send-email-jtulak@redhat.com> <1436964412-12093-2-git-send-email-jtulak@redhat.com> <20150715235306.GT3902@dastard> <1131231186.27908155.1437030777674.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1131231186.27908155.1437030777674.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Tulak Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com libxfs comes form the Linux kernel which uses these names, so we shouldn't rename them either. On various BSDS LIST* is used for different list macros, so the real question is how we end up including those. Can you post the compiler warnings you see without this patch? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs