From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787537FA4 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 06:21:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F2DAC002 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 04:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gnzoukBPIBAoV3HF (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 04:21:03 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] xfsprogs: Add fls check into autoconf Message-ID: <20150804112103.GF18906@infradead.org> References: <1438612789-17486-1-git-send-email-jtulak@redhat.com> <1438612789-17486-9-git-send-email-jtulak@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438612789-17486-9-git-send-email-jtulak@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Tulak Cc: hch@infradead.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Can't you just use something like: AC_CHECK_DECL([fls], [AC_DEFINE([HAVE_FLS_PROTOTYPE], [1], [Define to 1 if have fls prototype])], [], [#include ]) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs