From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355A97F50 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 02:15:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB958F8033 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oev7NueCxTLAawnH (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:15:18 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] xfs: disentagle EFI release from the extent count Message-ID: <20150812071518.GA14237@infradead.org> References: <1438883072-28706-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> <1438883072-28706-2-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> <20150809073641.GA3163@infradead.org> <20150810123726.GA18933@bfoster.bfoster> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150810123726.GA18933@bfoster.bfoster> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 08:37:27AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > > As a follow on we should be able to remove atomic_inc_return and > > replace it with a local iterator in xfs_bmap_finish(). > > > > I'm not sure what you mean here... efi_next_extent is not only used is to find a 'slot' for the extent in xfs_trans_log_efi_extent. For that we don't need an atomic_t in the EFI, but can have a local variable in xfs_bmap_finish. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs