From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] xfs: add missing bmap cancel calls in error paths
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:48:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150812124840.GC20635@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150812072109.GC14237@infradead.org>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:21:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 03:01:49PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > If a failure occurs after the bmap free list is populated and before
> > xfs_bmap_finish() completes successfully (which returns a partial list
> > on failure), the bmap free list must be cancelled. Otherwise, the extent
> > items on the list are never freed and a memory leak occurs.
> >
> > Several random error paths throughout the code suffer this problem. Fix
> > these up such that xfs_bmap_cancel() is always called on error.
>
> Looks sensible. I wonder if we should attach the freelist to the
> transaction and make xfs_trans_commit call into bmap_finish and
> xfs_trans_cancel into xfs_bmap_cancel in the longer run?
>
Perhaps... that's an interesting thought. I guess we'd also need to
consider other transaction operations (i.e., xfs_trans_roll()) to
support patterns such as that in xfs_attr_set(), for example. That one
also joins the inode between handling of the free list and transaction
commit, so that would need to be pushed down one way or another.
I wonder if there are enough vanilla bmap_finish()->trans_commit()
callers (e.g., without any intermediate code) to justify creation of a
new higher level xfs_trans_bmap_finish_commit() helper or some such that
handles both (retaining the existing interfaces for everything else).
> > +STATIC int
> > xfs_growfs_rt_alloc(
> > - xfs_mount_t *mp, /* file system mount point */
> > - xfs_extlen_t oblocks, /* old count of blocks */
> > - xfs_extlen_t nblocks, /* new count of blocks */
> > - xfs_inode_t *ip) /* inode (bitmap/summary) */
> > + struct xfs_mount *mp, /* file system mount point */
> > + xfs_extlen_t oblocks, /* old count of blocks */
> > + xfs_extlen_t nblocks, /* new count of blocks */
> > + struct xfs_inode *ip) /* inode (bitmap/summary) */
> > {
> > - xfs_fileoff_t bno; /* block number in file */
> > - xfs_buf_t *bp; /* temporary buffer for zeroing */
> > - int committed; /* transaction committed flag */
> > - xfs_daddr_t d; /* disk block address */
> > - int error; /* error return value */
> > - xfs_fsblock_t firstblock; /* first block allocated in xaction */
> > - xfs_bmap_free_t flist; /* list of freed blocks */
> > - xfs_fsblock_t fsbno; /* filesystem block for bno */
> > - xfs_bmbt_irec_t map; /* block map output */
> > - int nmap; /* number of block maps */
> > - int resblks; /* space reservation */
> > + xfs_fileoff_t bno; /* block number in file */
> > + struct xfs_buf *bp; /* temporary buffer for zeroing */
> > + int committed; /* transaction committed flag */
> > + xfs_daddr_t d; /* disk block address */
> > + int error; /* error return value */
> > + xfs_fsblock_t firstblock;/* first block allocated in xaction */
> > + struct xfs_bmap_free flist; /* list of freed blocks */
> > + xfs_fsblock_t fsbno; /* filesystem block for bno */
> > + struct xfs_bmbt_irec map; /* block map output */
> > + int nmap; /* number of block maps */
> > + int resblks; /* space reservation */
> > + struct xfs_trans *tp;
>
> Do we really need all this unrelated reformatting?
No, I've just been conditioned at this point to try and fix up any of
the typedefs that I notice in functions I touch so we can eventually
kill them. This was RT code, so I suspect isn't touched often and ended
up larger than typical.
Brian
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-10 19:01 [PATCH v3 00/13] xfs: miscellaneous logging, recovery, umount fixes Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] xfs: disentagle EFI release from the extent count Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] xfs: return committed status from xfs_trans_roll() Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] xfs: fix efi/efd error handling to avoid fs shutdown hangs Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] xfs: ensure EFD trans aborts on log recovery extent free failure Brian Foster
2015-08-18 23:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-19 11:02 ` Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] xfs: use EFI refcount consistently in log recovery Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] xfs: don't leave EFIs on AIL on mount failure Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] xfs: icreate log item recovery and cancellation tracepoints Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] xfs: fix broken icreate log item cancellation Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] xfs: checksum log record ext headers based on record size Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] xfs: clean up root inode properly on mount failure Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] xfs: fix btree cursor error cleanups Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] xfs: add helper to conditionally remove items from the AIL Brian Foster
2015-08-12 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-12 12:48 ` Brian Foster
2015-08-12 13:00 ` [PATCH v4 " Brian Foster
2015-08-10 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] xfs: add missing bmap cancel calls in error paths Brian Foster
2015-08-12 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-12 12:48 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2015-08-17 16:47 ` [PATCH 14/13] xfs: swap leaf buffer into path struct atomically during path shift Brian Foster
2015-08-17 21:34 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-17 22:19 ` Brian Foster
2015-08-17 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 " Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150812124840.GC20635@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox