From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3297CBE for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 17:57:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5ED0AC006 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 15:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JzSON2wy6m4lu1xA for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 15:57:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 08:57:34 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] xfs: Introduce writeback context for writepages Message-ID: <20150815225734.GZ3902@dastard> References: <1439333388-16452-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1439333388-16452-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20150812072635.GA32399@infradead.org> <20150813013244.GP3902@dastard> <20150813065258.GA677@infradead.org> <20150814015309.GU3902@dastard> <20150815132336.GA7385@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150815132336.GA7385@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 06:23:36AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:53:09AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Ok, I've gone back and had a look at this now and reminded myself of > > the discussion we had and the problems found. The end results are > > remarkably similar - maybe that's why I found it easy to write this > > patch set. i.e. your patchset was buried somewhere in my brain, even > > though I'd forgotten about it at the surface... > > > > How would you like to see this patchset broken up into more > > sensible/reviewable chunks? It's just folding and splitting patches, > > so it's not a big deal to rework it... > > I think it should be less. Patch 3 should go first, and then 1,2,4 & 5 > as a single one. No worries, I'll reorder and fold them, retest and repost. Thanks Christoph! -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs