From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE417F5F for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 08:37:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EE9304048 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 06:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3L1Oqtae6rcOPcWM (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 06:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 23:37:29 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the xfs tree Message-ID: <20150902233729.4e824342@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <1441200891.17400.1277.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20150902121649.7a686b6c@canb.auug.org.au> <20150902230342.125e23ce@canb.auug.org.au> <1441200891.17400.1277.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Roger Willcocks Cc: Jens Axboe , David Jeffery , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Ben Myers , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Hi Roger, On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:34:51 +0100 Roger Willcocks wrote: > > Huh, now I've had my coffee, that extra check doesn't add anything. > (There's no harm done in assigning zero to io_error if it's already > zero.) Apologies for the noise. That's OK, my excuse is being to far at the other end of the day ... I actually now remember thinking the same thing at the time I did it :-) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs